Showing posts with label Priscilla Baker-Carr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Priscilla Baker-Carr. Show all posts

September 08, 2024

56 Weeks with Nancy Drew - The Haunted Bridge

Book 15

Welcome to the 56 Weeks with Nancy Drew series! If you are new here, welcome. You can find my introductory post to this series here. Please note I will be including plot spoilers in this review series. I explain my reasoning at the start of this post.


Editions pictured: OT (25 chapters, 220 pages); RT (20 chapters, 180 pages)
OT publication date: 1937
My OT edition printed: approx. 1942
OT cover illustrated by: Russell Tandy
RT publication date: 1972
My RT edition printed: approx. 1972
RT cover illustrated by: Rudy Nappi
Ghostwriter: Mildred A. Wirt Benson
Editors: Edna Stratemeyer Squier & Harriet Stratemeyer Adams
Revised by: Priscilla Baker-Carr
OT & RT setting: Deer Mountain Hotel (a summer resort with a championship golf course), Andover (town near the hotel)


Introduction

I’ve been enjoying the experience of reading both the original text (OT) and the revised text (RT) Nancy Drews so much that when I saw an early edition of The Haunted Bridge with a dust wrapper, and for a reasonable price, I had to order it. I would love to be able to blame my waiting for that book to arrive as the reason this post is going up so much later than planned. But the book was annoyingly prompt in arriving at my door! The problem was getting myself to read the thing. I found the OT to be shockingly similar to the RT. It was so similar that reading these within the same month felt like trying to read the same book twice in a row. If you are filling in the gaps in your Nancy Drew collection I would say you could hold off on acquiring the alternate version of this one. There are other titles in this series that differ greatly between the two versions, but The Haunted Bridge is not one of them.


Synopsis

Nancy Drew and her friends, Bess Marvin and George Fayne, are visiting Deer Mountain Hotel with Nancy’s father, Carson Drew, who is there on legal business. The summer resort boasts many sporting activities, in addition to a champion golf course, which is where the girls spend most of their days. It’s the lead up to a championship tournament for amateur golfers and the club’s golf pro has urged Nancy to enter. Nancy is playing a qualifying round when she drives her ball into a patch of woods bordering the sixteenth hole. Nancy is keen to retrieve her lost ball as it is one signed by Jimmy Harlow. But Nancy’s caddy refuses to go near the footbridge which stands at the other side of the woods. Apparently, the bridge is haunted and all of the caddies are scared of the woods! But we know by now that Nancy doesn’t believe in spooks. Nevertheless, she is eager to find out what it is that has the caddies so afraid of the spot. 


Nancy soon discovers that the ghost is a rigged up scarecrow and the moaning sound is nothing more than the wind in the trees. But someone has gone to some length to deter people from exploring the woods and Nancy wants to know why. In her investigation, Nancy finds a chest on the muddy riverbank, which turns out to be chock full of jewelry. Meanwhile, Carson Drew has been investigating a notorious smuggling gang and guess what they’ve been smuggling? Jewels! Nancy suspects the chest of jewelry has something to do with these international jewel thieves. Carson Drew gets Nancy’s help by going around to the hotels in the area on the lookout for a suspect who is supposed to have a jewelled compact mirror in her possession. Inside the compact there is said to be a photo of a little boy. In a hotel powder room, Nancy strikes up a conversation with a woman who has a jewelled compact, but there is no photo inside. Logically, the photo could simply have been removed, but Nancy doesn’t believe the kind woman she talked to could be a jewel thief. Besides, when she complimented the woman about the eye-catching compact, the woman had been perfectly willing to talk about it and show it to Nancy. (As we all know, in Nancy Drew Land, baddies act suspiciously, and have cruel faces!)


But there is also a loyal gardener living in a cabin in the woods that has outdoor enclosures filled with injured or orphaned wild animals. The man still potters around the garden of the Judson mansion even though the family haven’t been back to the property since the big fire that demolished the place. When the gardener gets injured and needs round-the-clock care, Ned and his friends arrive on the scene just in time to offer their services. 


As all of this is going on, Nancy is competing in a golf tournament, which she fits her sleuthing around. Things are looking good for Nancy, that is until she falls off a balcony into some bushes when she tries to avoid coming into close contact with unwanted male attention. Mortimer Bartescue, or Martin, as he is called in the RT, is the kind of many any woman in their right mind would gladly throw themselves off a balcony to avoid. Unfortunately, Nancy painfully injures her hand, which makes it difficult to play golf. But, lucky for Nancy, even an injured hand and an accusation of cheating doesn’t prevent her from winning the tournament, finding the missing Judson girl, reuniting a couple, uncovering a band of international jewel thieves, and solving the mystery of the haunted bridge. Not that the “haunted bridge” really has anything to do with the rest of the story, but it is an undeniably intriguing title!


Reading the same book twice

I should say that unlike what I have done in the past, I did not take extensive notes on these books as I was reading. I am sure with a closer reading one would discover more differences than the few I picked out. The biggest differences I found were the fact that in the RT Mortimer Bartescue was changed to Martin Bartescue. Perhaps Mortimer was not as fashionable a name in 1972 as it was in 1937. I cannot say I have ever met a Mortimer, so maybe the name change wasn’t such a bad idea.


But the biggest difference I noted is the addition of Burt and Dave to the RT. These friends of Ned Nickerson’s from college are introduced in the RT as “Burt Eddleton, George’s friend, and Dave Evans, who dated Bess” (RT 94). In the OT Ned arrives at Deer Mountain Hotel with Bud Mason and Bill Cowan, who are first referred to as “two strange youths” (OT 120). I don’t believe we get any description that distinguishes them from each other, despite this being the first time Nancy or the other girls are introduced to them. As far as I can tell they are only there so that Ned has help looking after Joe Haley, the gardener, and so that when the group go to one of the hotel dances, there is an even number of males to females.


One scene, two books

I thought I’d pick a favourite scene to display just how similar these books are. The bolded text is where the two versions differ. The two instances where wording has simply been altered have been italicized

First we have the scene in the OT.


[T]he girls made their way toward the haunted bridge. Dark clouds were moving swiftly overhead, and by the time the chums reached the woods a strong wind was blowing.
"Do you think it will rain soon?" Bess asked anxiously, scanning the sky overhead.
"Oh, not for an hour at least," Nancy replied carelessly. "Even if it should, we'll be partially protected by trees. Let's not turn back now."
The girls struck off through the timber, and soon were within view of the old bridge. With the sun under a cloud it was dark and gloomy beneath the canopy of trees. Bess shivered and kept close to her companions. Suddenly they were startled to hear the same groaning sound which had frightened them on their previous visit.
"Oh!" Bess squealed in terror, clutching George's arm. "There it is again!"
Nancy warned her to be quiet, and for several minutes the girls stood perfectly still, waiting for the sound to be repeated. No one could be seen anywhere near the bridge.
"I believe the noise came from far down the ravine," Nancy whispered after she was convinced that the groan would not be repeated. "Come on, let's investigate."
After briefly searching the locality near the bridge, the girls turned their attention to the trail which had interested them upon their first visit to the spot. Footprints were plainly visible. Nancy wondered if someone had not used the path within the past twenty-four hours.
"Let's not go that way today," Bess pleaded, reading her chum's thoughts. "It's growing darker every instant, and we don't want to be caught in a storm."
Scarcely had the words been spoken when a shrill scream broke the stillness of the forest.
This time Nancy was certain that the cry had come from far down the ravine.
"Come on!" she urged excitedly. "We'll solve this old mystery yet!" (OT 109-10)


Now, for the same scene in the RT.

The girls made their way toward the haunted bridge. Dark clouds were moving swiftly overhead, and by the time they reached the woods a strong wind was blowing.
Soon they were within view of the old bridge.
Bess shivered and kept close to her companions.
Suddenly they were startled to hear the same moaning and groaning sounds which had perplexed them on their first visit.
"Oh!" Bess squealed, clutching George's arm.
Nancy warned her to be quiet, and for several minutes the girls stood perfectly still, waiting for the sound to be repeated. There was only a rustle of leaves in the breeze.
"I believe the noise came from somewhere right around here," said Nancy. "Let's investigate. Maybe we'll find someone's in hiding, playing a joke."
The girls searched through the brush and trees near both ends of the bridge, but found no one. Then they explored the trail they had seen on their previous visit which led along the ravine. Footprints were clearly visible. Had someone used the path within the past twenty-four hours?
A moment later a shrill scream broke the stillness. This time Nancy was certain that the cry had come from some distance up the ravine.
"Let's go!" she urged excitedly. "We'll solve the mystery of these strange sounds yet!" (RT 88-89)


As you can see the two texts are remarkably similar. The passage from the OT is 310 words while the RT is 214, which means 31% has been cut from the OT. But as the OT is 220 pages in its entirety and the RT is 180 pages, I would say that on average 19% of the OT has been cut. This is just an estimate, of course, because we are comparing page numbers, not word count. For the most part all that has been removed from the RT is description. Although, in the RT Nancy suggests that the sounds might be from someone “playing a joke”, which diffuses some of the tension. In the OT there is no such explanation offered, and the tension is left to continue to build as the scene plays out. I think most of us would agree that the OT is more atmospheric, but when you are aiming to cut down a text it does make the most sense to start with anything that could be construed as unessential. I must admit that it wasn’t until I was reading these two passages side by side that I was aware there was any difference, besides the change from the friends being referred to as “the chums” to simply “they”. 


Final thoughts

In my opinion, the person who revised the OT, Priscilla Baker-Carr, did a wonderful job. As I said at the outset, I felt like I was reading the same book twice. Nothing important had been altered and I think that readers who are most familiar with the OT could read the RT of this one and recognize the same Nancy. But I wonder if this is because The Haunted Bridge is a fairly tame book. This isn’t a book full of dramatic scenes like some of the other Nancy Drews I have read in the OT. For example, the OT of The Whispering Statue has Nancy save two people from a burning plane that has crash landed in the ocean. In that same book a house set on eroding cliffs is taken by the sea with Nancy inside! Both versions of The Haunted Bridge have a lot of golf, some dances, a bit of exploring in the woods, a suspected forger is locked in a caddy club house until the authorities arrive, Nancy, Bess, and George surreptitiously follow a car, and Nancy confronts a thief with a lot of backup near by, and that’s about it! Minus a brief scene when Nancy falls through a bridge and gets swept away by a storm swollen stream, The Haunted Bridge doesn’t go in for big drama and there was very little bonkersness. I cannot believe I am saying this, because I’ve never thought of myself as a fan of the less believable aspects of these books, but I think more drama and bonkersness would have made this a better book.


Coming up next…

Next time, I will be discussing the Nancy Drew with Persian kittens, tap dancing, Morse code, and a secret room. It’s The Clue of the Tapping Heels. I can assure you that we are in for bonkersness in spades with this one!


While you’re waiting for me to come up the goods, why not check out my new favourite podcast, Regular Nancy Drew? As always, I am late to the party on this one. Regular Nancy Drew has been recording since early 2021 and they already have 92 episodes in the bank. Listening to the hosts, Becky and Kori, is like chatting with your best friends about Nancy Drew. You can find Regular Nancy Drew just about anywhere you can listen to podcasts. But I must warn you that just like your favourite Nancy Drew, it’s very addictive. My friend and fellow Nancy Drew fan, the talented author, Barbara Matteson, introduced me to this podcast three weeks ago and I’ve been listening to about one episode a day ever since. It is so good!

May 15, 2024

56 Weeks with Nancy Drew - The Mystery of the Ivory Charm

Week 18, Book 13 

Welcome to the 56 Weeks with Nancy Drew series! If you are new here, welcome. You can find my introductory post to this series here. Please note I will be including plot spoilers in this review series. I explain my reasoning at the start of this post.


Edition pictured: Revised text (20 chapters, 179 pages)
Cover illustrated by: Rudy Nappi
Revised text publication date: 1974
Original text publication date: 1936
My edition printed: approx. 1978
Ghostwriter: Mildred A. Wirt Benson
Editors: Edna Stratemeyer Squier & Harriet Stratemeyer Adams
Revised by: Priscilla Baker-Carr
Setting: River Heights and local towns, Tannberg and Hanover

Originally published in 1936, I will be reviewing the revised text edition of The Mystery of the Ivory Charm, published in 1974 and pictured above. 


Carson Drew’s friend, Stanley Strong, needs someone to look into possible illegal activity going on at the wild animal show he owns and, of course, Nancy Drew is the one for the job (1)!

With friends Bess and George, and 5-year-old Tommy from down the street in tow, Nancy attends the wild animal show. There they come across a runaway elephant and have a run-in with a cruel animal trainer, Rai, who threatens to whip his son, Rishi, for not looking after the elephant. Nancy notices the man wears a beautiful ivory charm in the shape of an elephant on a cord around his neck. When she asks him about it, he tells her that the person who wears it is protected from harm (9). 

Afterwards, Mr. Strong tells Nancy he is suspicious of Rai. Beyond mistreating his son, Mr. Strong doesn’t know what Rai might be up to, but he would like Nancy to investigate the man (10-11). When Nancy arrives home from the excursion, she discovers a stowaway (12). Rishi has run away from Rai, who is not his real father. Before Rai’s wife died, she told Rishi that his real father is alive and living in River Heights (14). 


In this one, Nancy finds Rishi’s father, uncovers the power of the ivory charm, and restores a stolen fortune to a maharaja. She still has time to temporarily adopt a child (19), search for property (34-36), provide first aid (57-58), find an English tutor (63-64), have a long conversation about mysticism (73-76), help Hannah make breakfast (83), read the newspaper… or at least the headlines (84), dig herself out of a collapsed tunnel (92), go to a “wild-animal show”… twice (3-11, 100-106), go to the market (109), go to Emerson for the weekend for a fraternity party (134-138), pretend she has psychic powers (144-147), use her first aid skills a second time (148-149), jump to conclusions with little proof twice in one chapters and prove to be right both times (157, 159-160), save someone from drowning (162-163), provide yet more first aid (that course sure is coming in handy!) (175-176), eat six meals (which has got to be a record for the lowest number of meals mentioned in any Nancy Drew book!), and have a snack of tea and cake.


Time of year

    [Carson Drew’s] slender, attractive daughter walked toward the car. It was a sunny, warm May afternoon. Nancy’s strawberry-blond hair vividly contrasted her teal-blue convertible. (2)

In this one, there isn’t much mention of the weather,  the temperature, or even what Nancy is wearing. By setting the book in May, I assume the idea was to give Nancy good weather in which to solve the mystery, with the added benefit that Ned is still in university, so Nancy can take a weekend off of sleuthing to visit him. Of course, it doesn’t exactly work out that way, but Ned can keep on hoping!


There is one mention of the weather, a thunderstorm, which gives Nancy and her friends the opportunity to explore a house that has had the insides removed.

    “Rain hard outside,” Rishi said.
    “Then we’ll stay here until the storm’s over,” Nancy suggested.
    Rishi began to test the ropes and swings. Bess uttered a little cry of alarm as the boy swung through space, hanging by his knees from he bar of a trapeze. 
    “He’ll be killed!” she exclaimed.
    Nancy warned him to be careful. “The safety net is broken,” she cautioned. “And some of the ropes look very old and insecure.”
    “Rishi not take chance,” he promised.
    Outside the old house rain fell in torrents.
    “While we’re waiting I believe I’ll do a little investigating,” Nancy said. (50)


The house “without insides” and other nonsense

    An amazing sight met their gaze. The house was indeed “without insides.” The floor had been torn away. From the rafters of the ceiling hung several swings and trapezes, similar to these used in wild-animal acts, as well as many entangled ropes. (49)

I had a hard time wrapping my head around the idea of a house without insides when I read this book as a child, and I find it even more confusing now. Would it not make more sense to use a building that is already an open space, such as a barn, for the purpose of training animals or practicing a trapeze act?


Stranger still, one of the characters in this book lives in a barn. It is commented on as evidence of him being eccentric. Okay, fine. But clearly, there is no shortage of barns in the area. 

    “You won’t find Pete living in a regular house, though—not that guy. He’s too stingy to build himself a decent place. He lives in an old barn that was standing on the property when he bought it.”
[…]
    “This must be the place,” Nancy commented, stopping the car near a strange structure, which resembled neither a house nor a barn.
    The queer, tumble-down building had originally been painted brick red, but now appeared to be washed-out pink. A porch had been build at the front, and large windows were cut into the walls at uneven angles. An old silo, long since useless, adjoined the east side of the structure, while the west side was supported by a massive stone chimney.
    “Did you ever see such a crazy-looking house?” Bess giggled. “I wish I had a camera with me.” (115-116)


But the architecture in this book is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to things that make no sense. Given the title and the fact this is a children’s book that was repackaged in the 1970s, we can anticipate some racist stereotypes with this one and this is definitely the case. The racism in this book could probably be called “casual”, which is so easy to gloss over as just being of its time. 

Rishi, the Indian boy that Nancy meets at the wild animal show and who stows away in her car, refers to himself in the third person throughout the book despite Nancy having found him a professor to tutor him in English who comments on Rishi being unusually bright for a 12-year-old. I have never heard anyone who’s first language wasn’t English refer to themselves in the third person! All I can say is that is seems a lazy and insensitive way of handling Rishi’s dialogue. Thankfully, there are three other characters from India in this book and neither the author, editor, or publisher felt the need to impose any unusual speech characteristics on any of them!


Final thoughts 

Judging by the fact that all I’ve done is complain about this book, I’m sure you’ve already guessed that I didn’t enjoy this one very much. After reading the The Message in the Hollow Oak in the original text a few weeks ago and really enjoying the more adventurous and free-spirited version of Nancy in that book, I’m a bit worried that I’ve ruined myself for the revised texts. Although, I don’t remember particularly liking this one as a child either. I would have liked to have more scenes at the “wild-animal show” — which sounds to me a lot like a circus — and less time spent going to fraternity parties, and visiting the house “without insides”. Beyond the tunnel that leads from the house to a door that looks like it is part of a rock, the setting felt lacklustre. I don’t think the tunnel is ever property explained. The house “without insides” is explained as once being “the headquarters for a circus troupe” long before the current owner came into possession of the property (163). You know, just one of those odd coincidences!


Bonkers quotation

I have got into the habit of finishing these posts off with a favourite quotation from the book, but since I appear to only be ragging on this one — and I didn’t mark a single passage that I liked — I thought I might as well share this very strange section that made me wonder who this imposter is who is trying to pass herself off as Nancy Drew.

    Rishi bubbled with enthusiasm and his gaiety was imparted to the others. He loved the outdoors and amazed the girls with his stories of country life in his native land.
    He asked eager questions about the names of unfamiliar trees and birds he saw in the area. The girls were slightly embarrassed when they could not always answer him, and they resolved to devote themselves to nature lore with new interest.
    “I’m ashamed that I don’t know the names of half the birds I see,” Nancy confessed. “I’ll find out.” (34)

I found this very odd. In the Password to Larkspur Lane, Nancy shows herself to be knowledgeable about flowers, and she has some knowledge of birds too, as she nurses a homing pigeon back to health in that one. How are we supposed to believe that she can’t name the birds they see on the short drive in the countryside near her house? I’m all for a version of Nancy who is willing to admit when she doesn’t know something, and who is eager to learn more to fill in the gaps in her knowledge, but I would also like to see some consistency in Nancy across the books! 


Here’s hoping I have better luck with The Whispering Statue. This is another title where I have both the original and revised text versions in my collection. This time I plan to start with the revised text, in an effort to learn from the mistake I made reading the original text of The Message in the Hollow Oak and noticing all of the places where the revised text failed to live up to the original. Wish me luck!